Home » Commentary » Divided States of America

Divided States of America

American politics has assumed many of the unhealthy characteristics of its Indian counterpart, such as communal vote banks divided along religious and caste lines — reflected by Southern evangelist and white voters on the Republican side, arrayed against minority and women voters on the Democratic side.

By
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
Divided States of America

The 2012 presidential election has reaffirmed what political analysts have been arguing for some years: the country has almost irreversibly frozen into Democratic (blue) states and Republican (red) states. With the exception of just 15 swing states, — Minnesota, Wisconsin, Nevada, Iowa, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Virginia, Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Missouri and Indiana — Pres. Barack Obama and his Republican challenger Gov. Mitt Romney were separated by a margin of more than 10 percent in every other state. The gap ranged from a high of 84% in Washington, D.C., 43% in Hawaii and 36% in Vermont in favor of Obama to 48% in Utah, 41% in Wyoming and 34% in Oklahoma in favor of Romney.

As the accompanying U.S. map shows, the West Coast, Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states are solidly Democratic while the South and large swaths of the Midwest are solidly Republican. As a result, presidential elections are now fought in just 15 states.

American politics has assumed many of the unhealthy characteristics of its Indian counterpart, such as communal vote banks divided along religious and caste lines — reflected by Southern evangelist and white voters on the Republican side, arrayed against minority and women voters on the Democratic side. The political logjam the Republican minority has created in the U.S. Senate, where it has exploited filibuster rules to grind the chamber to a virtual halt, is indistinguishible from the paralysis of the Indian Parliament by the opposition.

Compromise and pragmatism that defined the American political experiment for two centuries has during the past two decades devolved into crass opportunism and obstructionism by the defeated Republicans on Captiol Hill. In the states that Republicans dominate, they have gerrymandered Congressional and legislative districts to their political advantage and raised voting barriers in a calculated bid to discourage and disenfranchise minorities and the poor, who typically don’t vote for them. As the demographic headwinds — a decline in the White population and exploding growth among Hispanics and Asian Americans — shift perceptibly against their political interests, expect Republicans to become ever more intransigent and Machiavellian in response.

Ironically, the Republican-leaning red states, which are defined by their virulent opposition to taxes and government programs, contribute significantly lower tax revenues and receive substantially higher federal aid than Democratic-leaning red ones. It should be politically palatable for both sides to give Republicans what they ask for by allowing states to opt out of or weaken federal programs they oppose, such as healthcare, Medicaid, food stamps, etc. It is a good bet that Republicans will not like their own medicine. And if they do, the state programs would be an excellent laboratory for exploring alternative and cost-effective solutions that may be worthy of national emulation.

We are deeply divided. Let’s live and let live our red and blue differences.

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted)

avatar
Frank Griffin December 18, 2012 at 4:57 AM
Another silly partisan article. Also quit trying to use big words just to use them. First off the senate was meant to slow legislation down. So a log jam for issues that barely make the 50% cut is expected and normal. As for Republicans using the filibuster, Democrats did the same thing when Republicans were in power so there is nothing evil unless both sides are evil due to playing by the rules. Both sides also redistrict to create advantages for their own party. Showing ID for voting is hardly disenfranchising voters. We need to show ID at the airport to fly. I don't think showing ID to vote in elections is the devils work. The republicans are against new taxes because we have a spending problem in washington not a taxing problem. Just like more meth will not cure an addict more money wont cure washington spending. In fact 75% of all tax increases proposed by Obama are already slated for new programs not to pay down the debt. You also mention defeated republicans. The republicans that are in control of congress were not defeated and are there voted in by the people to keep Obama in check. If this was not so they would have been defeated.
I hate to inform you of this but the Republicans are being the adults in the room and folks like you Achal and Obama are the children having a tantrum because you don't want to share power.
Please try to learm more about America and its history before you say such stupid things in the future!
total: 1 | displaying: 1 - 1

Post your comment

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Underline
  • Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha
  • Email Email
  • Print Print

Tagged as:

Commentary | Politics | Magazine | December 2012 | NRI

Rate this article

0
Submit Link

We are looking for the best Indian stories on the web. If you see something interesting, send us a link to the story.