 |
Plot that Flopped
By Shekhar Hattangadi
Why did Ashutosh Gowariker’s
much-anticipated Swades flop in India?
|
  |

|
| |
|
.gif) |
|
The greatest sin for an artiste is
to bore his audience. – Anonymous.
What is it about some of our favorite
public figures that makes us root for
them almost unconditionally? Their talent
and tenacity? Their sincerity and earnestness?
Their comparative youth and humble origins?
Or just the fact that their professional
efforts inspire our own idealized struggles
against everyday mediocrity?
Much like a cricket-crazy nation mutters
a silent prayer every time Mumbai’s
boy-next-door Sachin Tendulkar walks
in to bat, a legion of Ashutosh Gowariker’s
post-Lagaan admirers — including
several in the otherwise hard-to-please
national media — all but willed
the film-maker’s latest offering
to succeed at the box office. And much
like Tendulkar’s batting performance
in recent times, Swades has had a scratchy,
unsure and largely forgettable stint
in the first month of its theatrical
release.
To his credit, Gowariker has been candid
enough to admit that his film has evoked
an underwhelming initial response from
the general movie-going public. His
co-producers (UTV) however claim success
by citing overseas box-office figures
— always a dubious measure considering
that those collections (especially in
the two biggest overseas territories
of USA and UK) get multiplied about
50 and 75 times respectively in rupee
terms at the current foreign-exchange
rates.
Swades tells the story of an NRI pining,
among other things, for his desi roots,
so it’s no surprise that the film
has triggered a greater curiosity and
received a warmer reception among overseas
Indians than in the domestic market.
But more importantly, how does the film
fare as a piece of cinema? Does it really
transport us into the troubled mind
of its protagonist Mohan Bhargava, and
make us care enough for his existential
concerns?
Gowariker’s self-confessed love
for old Bollywood prompts one to rewind
into some black-and-white Hindi film
classics.
V. Shantaram was up against a similar
cinematic challenge in his 1946 biopic
Dr.Kotnis Ki Amar Kahani. It chronicled
the life of a Bombay-based doctor who
volunteered to help the Chinese resistance
against the Japanese invasion during
World War II. Along the way, he married
a Chinese woman, sired a child and then
died in a battle camp before he could
seriously contemplate returning to his
homeland. Dr. Dwarkanath Kotnis was,
by circumstance if not by choice, a
“Non-Returning Indian” (a
phrase that forms part of the Swades
heroine’s vituperative ammunition
against Bhargava) and his loyalties
transcended the country’s borders.
|
 |
 |
|
But the Kotnis tale nevertheless struck
a chord in the hearts and minds of audiences,
thanks largely to Shantaram’s
genius at making the Indian doctor’s
idealism and humanitarian mission as
well as his interpersonal cross-cultural
conflicts in faraway China believable
— and even acceptable —
to our own sensibilities.
The verdict on Swades among Indian
cinegoers may be mixed, but there is
a general consensus on the nobility
of its theme and on its inordinate length.
At 210 minutes (three-and-a-half hours),
Swades is actually shorter than Gowariker’s
earlier Lagaan, but few seemed to mind
the 224 minutes of that film and its
elaborate cricket match. In fact, the
list of blockbusters in Hindi cinema
down the years is replete with films
that either nudged or far exceeded the
three-hour mark: Awaara (1951 –
193 mins), Mother India (1957 –
172 mins), Mughal-e-Azam (1960 –
173 mins), Sangam (1964 – 238
mins), Aradhana (1969 – 169 mins),
Bobby (1973 – 168 mins), Sholay
(1975 – 204 mins), and Dilwale
Dulhaniya Le Jaayenge (1995 –
192 mins).
Those who might be tempted to conclude
that Indians love bulk and will therefore
fall without question for long movies
would do well to note another sobering
fact: Indian cinema’s biggest
flop to date — Mera Naam Joker
(1970) — is also its longest ever
movie at four-plus hours! A more recent
(2003) four-hour casualty was J.P.Dutta’s
LOC-Kargil.
Perhaps the obvious lesson here is
that it’s not merely the number
of screen minutes, but their riveting
power that ultimately determines a film’s
box-office fate. And the not-so-obvious
one is that when viewers complain about
a film’s extended duration, they
are actually telling us in other words
that they were quite simply bored.
Gowariker, one suspects, had a prescient
notion of this problem at the time of
the film’s release. A lori (Hindi
for lullaby) picturized on Shahrukh
Khan, which figured prominently in the
film’s pre-release promos (“Aahista,
aahista…”), was excised
from the final released version of Swades.
Length apart, the key question one
needs to ask about Swades is two-fold:
Did the film fail despite its theme
or because of it? And, more particularly,
was it the theme itself or its treatment
that let the film down?
|
 |
.gif) |
|
Prima facie, who can quibble about a
theme as contemporary, progressive and
courageous as that of Swades? Courageous,
because Gowariker was on a good wicket
post-Lagaan for raising finances for
his next project, and would have been
tempted to take on an easier route (meaning,
a less emotionally and sociologically
complex theme) to prove that Lagaan
was no fluke hit and to establish himself,
in the manner of a candyfloss-and-popcorn
director like Karan Johar, as a bankable
film-maker.
But Gowariker apparently — and
one might add, admirably — preferred
the risk-laden path to greatness. And
so, he opted for an ambitious multi-layered
story that seeks to comment on a host
of personal and social issues, ranging
from patriotism, commitment to one’s
roots, old-age loneliness, literacy
and education, science and technological
development, caste conflict, survival
of traditional craft-based labor and
feminism right down to rural poverty
and oppression. Phew!
Did Gowariker’s artistic ambition
get the better of his pragmatic judgment?
Surely, Swades is not the first Hindi
film to tackle these issues, but it’s
arguably the only one to take them all
on in the same story. The socially-conscious
films of V. Shantaram, Bimal Roy, Guru
Dutt, Raj Kapoor and others are marvelous
examples of the directorial maturity
with which such themes were explored
in the realm of our mainstream cinema
from 1930s onwards.
|
 |
.gif) |
|
To recall a few, Shantaram made Padosi
(on communal harmony), Dahej (dowry),
Do Aankhen Barah Haath (prison reform)
and Duniya Na Maane (1937), a film that
predated modern feminism by several
decades. Bimal Roy’s Do Bigha
Zameen was a poignant saga of poor farmers
in the face of rampant industrialization,
while his Sujata depicted the plight
of an untouchable girl in a casteist
society. Guru Dutt explored the relationship
between an artiste and his consumerist
environment in Pyaasa and Kaagaz Ke
Phool. With characteristic flourish,
Raj Kapoor spoke up (mostly sang) for
the marginalized, tramps and waifs,
in Awaara, Shri 420, Boot Polish and
Jaagte Raho. Even B.R. Chopra, who turned
to multi-starrer potboilers later in
his career, successfully pitted man
against machine in the memorable 1957
hit Naya Daur.
Ponder what earned these films the
status of a classic. To be sure, an
audience that appreciated and supported
the realism of their content, even while
it enjoyed the song-and-dance and comedy
routines interwoven into the stories.
The success of these films is as much
a tribute to the cinegoers as it is
to the film-makers of those times. Imagine
a dialogue-less opening sequence running
to nearly two minutes in which the poet-hero
lolls in a park watching the birds and
bees (literally), and winces when a
pedestrian’s foot crushes one
of the bees. The film, Pyaasa (1957),
was a major hit.
Unfortunately for Gowariker and his
contemporaries, the MTV-spawned audience
of today has little patience for such
meditations. And this very audience
is at least partly to blame for the
virtual absence of meaningful themes
in contemporary Hindi cinema.
The modern-day information boom also
ensures that films today get dissected,
analyzed and compared, much to the consternation
of their makers. Gowariker has cringed
at people comparing Swades with Lagaan.
That, in any case, is an unavoidable
knee-jerk reaction from viewers. And
Gowariker himself hasn’t exactly
bolstered his complaint by opening the
Swades website with a reminder of Lagaan’s
Oscar nomination.
But let’s examine the old classics
for what made them tick. Was the nobility
of purpose and motive input enough to
ensure a good, solid entertainer? Apparently
not. Crafted with consummate skill and
care, each of the classics took care
to focus on a single and clearly identifiable
theme.
Swades, in contrast, contains the seeds
of a handful of potential film-plots
that remain either unexplored or frustratingly
half-baked. It’s not that Gowariker
lacks the maturity of the old masters
to develop these ideas. Rather, there
are way too many dishes on his plate
to expect the film-maker to do justice
to any of them. And so, confronted first-hand
with the heart-rending story of the
wretched weaver-turned-farmer from whom
he has to collect land-rent dues, his
hero resorts to, what seems in retrospect,
the easy band-aid option moneyed tourists
prefer in the name of expediency: Bhargava
tries to assuage his own conscience
by stuffing a wad of currency notes
in the farmer’s hands.
Again, the old-time masterpieces had
at their core a story that made its
chosen social issue real and palpable,
without eschewing the seemingly mandatory
elements like song-and-dance routines.
Various aspects of the issue grew organically
out of that story and were resolved
as the plot unfolded on the way to its
climax. As a result, few of those films
ever needed to fall back on a didactic
crutch to make their point.
|
 |
.gif) |
|
Swades too has its share of songs and
dances, and its mildly comic moments.
Gowariker also pays homage to old Hindi
films by having his hero drive into
the heroine’s village with a song
celebrating life’s journey and
anticipating a brush with the unseen/unknown
heroine — a mandatory song situation
that opened umpteen Hindi films of yore.
The homage extends to the song’s
tune: “Yeh raasta hai keh raha
ab mujhse/Milne ko hai koyi kahin ab
tujhse…” echoes “Aap
ko pehle bhi kahin dekha hai…”
from the 1970 film Tum Haseen Main Jawaan.
And Gowariker’s heroine-as-school-teacher
isn’t lost on those viewers who’re
familiar with heroines pursuing similar
occupations in Shree 420 (Nargis) and
Kaagaz Ke Phool (Waheeda Rehman).
But Swades gets unbearably preachy
and propagandist when its lead characters
periodically spout long, self-righteous
monologues. Not that monologues by themselves
are a no-no, or that they were unheard
of in our older films. But they rarely
rankled. The two most celebrated ones
— in Pyaasa and Jaagte Raho —
are logical conclusions of their heroes’
travails, and provide a justifiable
catharsis in the climactic scenes. Raj
Kapoor’s terrace outburst in the
latter, coming after his wordless journey
through the entire film, is a master-stroke
of irony.
The monologues in Swades seem tedious
and out-of-place precisely because Gowariker’s
screenplay falls short of making his
hero’s dilemmas palpable enough
to enlist audience empathy. Gowariker’s
central concern in Swades isn’t
sufficiently gripping or dramatic. Whether
Bhargava’s old nanny Kaveriamma
finally lives with him in USA or stays
back in India with the heroine Geeta,
the question that the film throws up
at its intermission point, is just not
something that grabs us, especially
after we know that Bhargava hasn’t
been in touch for a dozen-plus years
and his trip was prompted by a fleeting
pang of nostalgia for his dead parents.
|
 |
.gif) |
|
The medium of cinema loves physicality,
and classical screenwriting posits that
psychological concerns are best played
out dramatically through physical acts.
It’s tempting therefore to speculate
if Swades would have worked better with
the make-shift hydro-electric power
project (which Bhargava initiates and
brings to fruition) at the heart of
its plot as the hero’s primary
goal. In the hands of an astute writer,
the story of its planning, construction
and commissioning could have lent itself
seamlessly to the exploration and resolution
of Bhargava’s personal and the
villagers’ social conflicts. But
the project sadly remains a minor sidelight
of the film.
Even more off-putting is Gowariker’s
concession to ethnic chic in choosing
the film’s title. For a director
who smarts at comparisons with Lagaan,
the use of a dialect in naming Swades
is nothing but a hangover of his previous
film. Such use was definitely in order
for Lagaan where most of the Indian
characters spoke the Awadhi dialect.
In Swades however, the leading characters
speak normal Hindi and its legitimate
title should have been “Swadesh.”
But that probably sounds too plain and
unfashionable.
Another nod to trendy fashion is the
characterization of the Swades heroine.
True, she shows her steel by refusing
to toe Bhargava’s line later in
the film, but she begins with a hostility
against the hero that is unwarranted
and immature. The typical Hindi formula
film heroine of the 1960-70s too started
her relationship with the flirty hero
in a mock-hostile manner. But that was
part of the token resistance she put
up against his amorous advances, and
was at best vacuous. That’s old
hat now. The new “formula”
— in which the heroine presumes
the NRI hero to be arrogant about his
wealth and social standing, and therefore
acts super-arrogant as an anticipatory
gesture — is especially discernable
in the NRI films and is no less vacuous.
The virulent trend began with Hyderabad
Blues and has caught on, be it in American
Desi or Bride and Prejudice.
|
|
.gif) |
|
Swades also disappoints in other departments.
Gowariker would have missed Anil Mehta’s
assured camerawork that gave Lagaan
a distinctive look and idiom. A.R. Rehman’s
music is uneven. The acting is uniformly
earnest, though the best thing one can
say about Shahrukh Khan’s performance
is that director Gowariker has succeeded
in reining in his tendency to ham.
Conventional wisdom in the entertainment
industry holds that it’s always
difficult, if not impossible, to make
a great second film, to replicate the
success of your first work. Lagaan was
Gowariker’s third directorial
attempt, but the first two (Pehla Nasha
and Baazi) fared so poorly that many
have come to believe that Lagaan was
indeed his debut effort. By that token,
one would have to let Swades pass as
a bygone in the law of averages.
One can’t help wager that Swades-II
— if Gowariker ever cares to make
a sequel on the life of his hero after
he resettles in India for good —
holds far greater promise than Swades-I.
Indians treat vacationing NRIs with
kid-glove indulgence. After all, who
wants to tangle with a gift-carrying
do-dinka mehmaan? But, as a resettled
NRI, I know that a permanent return
brings a much harsher reality to light.
Mohan Bhargava would then encounter
hitherto unseen sides of the “real”
India, and have a lot more to grapple
with than his angst-ridden conscience
and the friendly neighborhood postman.
|
| |
|