We may be monetarily richer, but are we poorer in friends?
The homemade chicken curry, the daal and the vegetable pullao would travel by subway and by car, each lovingly coddled in aluminum foil. Made by different hands in different kitchens, they would be united on a table for rag-tag self-made families of immigrants stitched from diverse parts of India. These friends may not have known each other even a month ago, yet in an alien land they became connected, instant family.
Yes, there was a time when newcomers to America would gather in each other's homes, bringing their specialty, be it saag or gulab jamuns. While the children played or watched TV, the men would gather over beer discussing cricket, politics and green cards, while the women traded secret recipes for the no-sweat method of making favorite dishes, tips about where to buy good sneakers for the children, or vented about problems at the workplace.
So, what's happening with the larger American population may be playing out in the growing Indian community as well as it is mainstreamed. New immigrants in ethnic enclaves tend to have a stronger support system, but once they fly the coop into the prestigious suburbs, a chasm separates them from old friends. Three decades ago when Indu Jaiswal, a dietician in Long Island, gave birth to twin boys, she and her husband, recent immigrants, had no family to turn to. They were living in Queens at that time and had two Indian families in their neighborhood. "These were people I had not known in India and they just happened to be neighbors," recalls Jaiswal. "When I was ready to come home from the hospital, they drove me home. They cooked for me for a week and took care of the babies, almost as if I was their daughter. They were more than my parents. I feel like crying when I think of all that they did for me." She adds, "I'm sure in today's world that kind of help would not be possible; people are far too busy. The social structure seems to have changed and everyone wants to make more money and live on an upscale level. So between working and home, they don't have time for an outside person." Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni, the noted novelist who lives in Houston, Texas, also remembers a different time. "When I was a grad student at the University of California at Berkeley in the early 80s, we Indian students - about 15 of us - were all on tough budgets, but once a month we would get together in someone's apartment and cook things together; some items were disasters! We would sit on the carpet to eat, because there weren't enough chairs. It was so much fun! "Also, if we needed help with moving to a different apartment, everyone would help. It was the same way after I got married."
She says that her sister-in-law who came to the United States even earlier remembers scrolling through the phone book for Indian names and calling them: "They would be so friendly and invite her over and give many helpful hints about survival. At that time there was no distinction of communities or languages. We were all Indians together."
With the Indian American population touching 2.5 million there is not the same intensity or pressure to bond with other Indians. People can go to Indian stores or chat with other Indians via email at the drop of a hat. The same needs are just not there. Relationships are dynamic and change over a period of time depending on the structure of our society, says Abraham. In the 1980s, people would drop in to the homes of India-bound friends to send letters or gifts to their family. A box of mithai brought by a friend from India was a delight. Now we have a surfeit of sweets in our own Indian markets and are quite blasé about them. "So even the little gestures of caring are being eradicated and those small rituals of our social bonding are being lost," says Abraham. "All those mechanisms, which are part of relationships are changed. I don't think the circles are disappearing, but they are reconfigured in a way that the amount of time we spend on relationships is much less and a certain amount of the personal has been depersonalized." In her own life she says she has "circles of significance" - people who are very significant in her life, While you may want to do things for multiple people and have the desire and intent, the reality is that it's just not possible. She says: "It's not the old days when you could just drop things and take off for a week to visit a sick friend. Now it's more a call, an email to show the caring. India has changed too. You could go to people's houses any time, but now that's not done. I think it's all about romanticizing a time." Perhaps the biggest reason for the change is technology, which has not only bound us to our desks, but also has set us free. The hours that one can work have multiplied and the line between home and the office has blurred. You can be home and not yet home, if you're working out of a home office. For many of us, our work defines us. The old neighborly rituals are lost as each family bunkers down at home with computer, DVD and Ipods. "The workload is also taking its toll on the second generation. Everybody is working 18 hours a day, whether you're a lawyer, engineer, doctor, accountant or finance person," says Indu Jaiswal. "Anybody who's working in the corporate world is working at least 12 to 14 hours a day. Whatever time they have they go out for a drink or for a movie. They don't have the time to form circles or meaningful friendships." Technology is also facilitating news ways for friends to maintain their connections. They may not rush out for visits, bearing Tupperware containers of food, but they keep tabs on each other with emails or SMS. Now telephone conversations to India are so cheap - or even free through programs like Skype - that now India is closer than your neighbor's home. You may not want to intrude on your busy, time-deprived neighbor, but can chat for an hour on those incredibly cheap phone cards to your sister in Delhi, who may have more time with the support networks around her. When Abraham came to the United States in 1984, it cost her $13 to call India for three minutes. Today it's practically free. Email has also opened up connections, and she points out that her mother, who is 72 years old, emails her daughters and grandchildren from India every day and keeps current with their day-to-day lives. Similarly, many friendships have become email or phone based as people don't have the time to meet or the distances are too vast. If a family member or friend is sick, group emails about the progress are a way to keep up efficiently. Communities are not only defining themselves by their ethnicity, but class and materialism are also playing an increasing role. Indeed, one important change that has occurred in Indian circles is the widening social divide. Abraham says that in the last decade, huge class differences have emerged within the Indian community and these manifest themselves in their relationships. The interactions with those who are born here and abroad are also very different and there's a kind of separation of spaces. One observer of the social scene, who asked not to be named, says the criteria for friendship seems to have changed - it is about having a big house and a big car, and if they are missing, they don't want to know you. People, he says, tend to be lost in their own world and reaching out and helping others is not a priority. Yes, the circle of friendship is certainly getting reconfigured and it may now embrace larger social groups and organizations. The second generation, for instance, form meaningful bonds in their connections within youth groups like South Asian Youth Association or advocacy organizations like Sakhi. Earlier, such groups did not exist, but now there are multiple niches where people can find support and lose their sense of isolation.
Close friendships are substituted to some degree by organizations and other support groups, says Abraham: "Our notions of intimacy and long enduring friendships and expectations have changed in the way we relate to others, because today we have multiple ways of contact that we didn't have earlier." |
biju joseph
newyork
Post your comment