Home » Odds & Ends » Chastising The Chaste

Chastising The Chaste

By LIFS June 10, 2008 at 9:03 PM
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
A Delhi High Court has denounced the "new puritanism" of "ignorant people" in dismissing obscenity complaints against eminent Indian painter MF Husain.

Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul said the allegations against the 93-year-old painter who lives in self-imposed exile in London are baseless, adding that "A painter at 90 deserves to be sitting in his home and painting his canvas."

 
"A painter has his own perspective of looking at things and it cannot be the basis of initiating criminal proceedings against him," Kaul said in his 74-page judgment. "In India, new puritanism is being carried out in the name of cultural purity and a host of ignorant people are vandalizing art and pushing us towards a pre-renaissance era."

Husain's painting, "Bharatmata," depicting a nude woman symbolizing mother India was deemed offensive by some Hindu groups. However, Kaul noted: "Ancient art has never been devoid of eroticism where sex worship and graphical representation of the union between man and woman has been a recurring feature." Kaul said, "Art is never chaste - where it is chaste, it is not art." 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (0 posted)

total: | displaying:

Post your comment

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Underline
  • Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha
  • Email Email
  • Print Print

Tagged as:

Odds & Ends | Magazine | June 2008

Rate this article

0
Submit Link

We are looking for the best Indian stories on the web. If you see something interesting, send us a link to the story.