|
|
Union
Minister of State for Non Resident Indian
Affairs Jagdish Tytler announced in early
August that dual citizenship registration
would begin this September.
If that is beginning to sound like déjà
vu all over again, it is. Ever since the
L M Singhvi report in 2002 proposed dual
citizenship for overseas Indians in 16
countries — Australia, Canada, Finland,
France, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy,
Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Cyprus,
Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and
the United States of America — the
Indian government has been engaged in
a perennial striptease dance with overseas
Indians.
|
|
Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee announced
dual citizenship with much fanfare at
the first Pravasi Bhartiya Diwas in January
2003. What he was really declaring, however,
was the government’s intention to
grant dual citizenship. Legislation was
introduced in parliament in May 2003 and
just in time for another grand pronouncement
at the next Pravasi Diwas in January 2004,
the law was passed unanimously and received
the president’s assent.
Unbeknownst to most observers, however,
the bill’s language was artfully
changed from “dual citizenship”
to “overseas citizenship.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under
the circumstances, the startling
announcement by Tytler that overseas
citizenship registration will begin
this month has to be taken with
a pinch of salt.. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
What is significance of this mysterious
name change? It is yet unclear. What the
law makes clear is that overseas citizens
will not have political rights to vote
or to run for public office or the right
to public employment. The reasons for
the name change are buried in the byzantine
bureaucracy of the external, the home,
and the law ministries, where the bill
was slapped together.
And those real motivations may be sprung
upon us only when the rules are finally
promulgated. Ah, the rules...
You see, you were mistaken if you thought
dual or overseas citizenship had come
to pass when parliament approved the law.
You underestimate the deviousness of the
Indian bureaucracy. They now get to set
the rules and so we are back in the mazes
of the babus in the three ministries.
Under the circumstances, the startling
announcement by Tytler that overseas citizenship
registration will begin this month has
to be taken with a pinch of salt. He is
taking over a newly created ministry,
presently operating out of a cubby hole
of an office in the South Block, with
a paltry budget of just $1.5 million,
and is reportedly wrangling with the ministry
of external affairs, which is leery of
letting go of its NRI affairs division.
Indeed there is considerable speculation
that Tytler’s headline-grabbing
announcement was a shot across the bow
in his tussle with the MEA.
Citizenship matters ultimately fall under
the jurisdiction of the home ministry
and it has given no indication of being
close to promulgating the rules. Tytler
told one interviewer in mid-August, “It
is almost done. Registration will start
in less than a month. It is currently
with the law ministry for technical reasons.
Everything is clear.”
There was only one remaining hitch, Tytler
dismissively told the reporter. “We
just have to decide the registration fee
that will be charged.”
Hmm.... Some roadblock, especially considering
that the Pravasi Bharatiya Diwas website
has been reporting for some time that
the fee is “proposed to be fixed
at $100.”
In any event, the rules can come into
force only after they are tabled in parliament.
The Indian Embassy in Washington, D.C.
reports cryptically, “The rules,
regulations and requirements are still
under process and our web site will be
updated on this as and when instructions
are received from Government of India.”
Their phone hasn’t rung yet.
So don’t make a beeline to the Indian
consulate anytime soon. We still don’t
know if the striptease performance is
finally over, or the latest curtain call
is just an intermission before the next
tantalizing act.
|
|